Nnlegal status of eastern greenland denmark v norway pdf merger

A country is bound by the reply given on its behalf by its minister of foreign affairs. Denmark s position in greenland formed the subject of a request addressed by the danish government to the norwegian government in july 1919, and of a declaration on the part of the latter government accepted by the danish government. A suit was instituted before the permanent court of international justice hereinafter pcij by royal danish government against the royal norwegian government. To ascertain the legal status of eastern greenland, the pcj relied on the following premises. On denmark s entry into the european commu nity on i january 197 3 greenland was included in the community as part of denmark. The permanent court of international justice pcij laid down that occupation to be effective should be accompanied by two elements. Denmark claimed that the norwegian position on eastgreenland. This case concerned a dispute between denmark and norway over sovereignty in eastern greenland. The inuits need for protection against foreign exploitation and the. The year 1814 was perhaps the most eventful in norway s history. Agreement between the government of the kingdom of norway on the one hand, and the government of the kingdom of denmark together with the home rule government of greenland on the other hand.

Norway has acquired the sovereignty over eirik raudes land. A country is bound by the reply given on its behalf by its minister of foreign. Steglichpetersen, advocate at the supreme court of denmark, as agents. Legal status of eastern greenland, judgment, 5 apr 1933 jus mundi. At the time, norway occupied certain parts of east greenland. A dispute arose on the legal status of eastern greenland with both norway and denmark claiming sovereign rights over the territory. The question was not raised further until 1930, when norway conferred police powers on certain of her subjects for the inspection of the norwegian hunting stations in eastern greenland, and denmark protested. The agreement not to obstruct danish p plans with regard to greenland was what denmark wanted to obtain fro. A principal contention of norway was that a delimitation had already been.

The court made the ihlen declaration binding thereby conferring the sovereignty to denmark. A summary and case brief of legal status of eastern greenland denmark v. The danish government should bear the costs incurred by the norwegian government in this case. The idea of altering greenland s association with the community became a topical issue with the establishment of greenland s home government system. Denmark had asked the court to draw a single line of delimitation of those areas at a. The legal status of eastern greenland had not recognized danish sovereignty over the whole of greenland. Case concerning the legal status of the southeastern. To search the full text of caserelated pdf documents published on this website e. In response, ihlen made the declaration on 22 july 1919 that. Legal status of eastern greenland, judgment, 5 apr 1933.